文件
skills/cc-switch-dev-workflow/scripts/init_workflow_repo.py

693 行
30 KiB
Python
可执行文件

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Initialize a target repo with first-round workflow artifacts for Claude and Codex."""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import json
import re
from datetime import datetime, timezone
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
from bootstrap_workflow_workspace import PLAYBOOK_FILES, seed_workspace
try:
from inspect_cc_switch_runtime import collect_summary
except ImportError: # pragma: no cover
collect_summary = None
TRACKS: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
"hono-react-ssr-tanstack": {
"label": "Hono + React SSR/TanStack",
"language": "TypeScript",
"ui": "React",
"styling": "Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui",
"auth": "Better Auth",
"data_fetching": "TanStack Query",
"router": "TanStack Router",
"service_layer": "Hono",
"orm": "Drizzle",
"database": "PostgreSQL",
"reason": "default tie-break track for clear boundaries and better agent task slicing",
},
"nextjs-fullstack": {
"label": "Next.js Full Stack",
"language": "TypeScript",
"ui": "React",
"styling": "Tailwind CSS + shadcn/ui",
"auth": "Better Auth",
"data_fetching": "TanStack Query where needed",
"router": "Next.js App Router",
"service_layer": "Next.js route handlers / server actions",
"orm": "Drizzle",
"database": "PostgreSQL",
"reason": "single-framework delivery track when page and service logic should stay tightly integrated",
},
}
PLAYBOOK_CONTEXT: dict[str, dict[str, Any]] = {
"new-project-from-scaffold": {
"label": "New Project From Scaffold",
"spec_file": "000-foundation-and-bootstrap-constraints.md",
"goal_hint": "Bootstrap a new repo with one approved stack track, one workflow contract, and first-round planning artifacts.",
"default_in_scope": [
"Fix the project on one approved stack track",
"Generate first-round workflow documents and handoff",
"Prepare the repo for Research -> Spec -> Code",
],
"default_out_of_scope": [
"Feature-complete product implementation",
"Adding a second framework track",
"Ad-hoc exceptions without ADR approval",
],
},
"existing-project-spec-backfill-and-refactor": {
"label": "Existing Project Spec Backfill And Refactor",
"spec_file": "000-foundation-and-backfill-contract.md",
"goal_hint": "Stabilize an existing codebase by backfilling rules, workflow contract, and the first spec/refactor queue.",
"default_in_scope": [
"Baseline the current repo and write first-round workflow docs",
"Backfill initial spec contract and alignment backlog",
"Prepare refactor work under an explicit rule layer",
],
"default_out_of_scope": [
"Large implementation rewrites before baseline review",
"Unbounded refactors without spec backing",
"Running two primary stack tracks in parallel",
],
},
"spec-code-alignment-gap-closure": {
"label": "Spec-Code Alignment Gap Closure",
"spec_file": "000-gap-closure-working-contract.md",
"goal_hint": "Re-establish spec/code consistency with a first-round gap-analysis contract and execution queue.",
"default_in_scope": [
"Classify current spec/code gaps",
"Generate first-round alignment docs and tasks",
"Prepare implementation and review gates for closure work",
],
"default_out_of_scope": [
"Rewriting the product without gap evidence",
"Changing accepted specs without review",
"Treating elegance as a substitute for compliance",
],
},
}
def parse_list(values: list[str] | None) -> list[str]:
if not values:
return []
result: list[str] = []
for raw in values:
parts = [part.strip() for part in raw.split(",")]
result.extend(part for part in parts if part)
return result
def slugify(text: str) -> str:
lowered = text.strip().lower()
slug = re.sub(r"[^a-z0-9]+", "-", lowered)
return slug.strip("-") or "project"
def load_package_json(target_dir: Path) -> dict[str, Any]:
package_json = target_dir / "package.json"
if not package_json.exists():
return {}
try:
data = json.loads(package_json.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
except json.JSONDecodeError:
return {}
return data if isinstance(data, dict) else {}
def detect_track(target_dir: Path, playbook: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
package_data = load_package_json(target_dir)
dependencies = set()
for key in ("dependencies", "devDependencies"):
block = package_data.get(key, {})
if isinstance(block, dict):
dependencies.update(block.keys())
if "hono" in dependencies or "@tanstack/react-router" in dependencies:
return "hono-react-ssr-tanstack", "detected from package.json dependencies"
if "next" in dependencies or any((target_dir / name).exists() for name in ("next.config.js", "next.config.mjs", "next.config.ts")):
return "nextjs-fullstack", "detected from package.json or next.config.*"
if playbook == "new-project-from-scaffold":
return "hono-react-ssr-tanstack", "default tie-break from framework decision matrix"
return "hono-react-ssr-tanstack", "default target track pending setup confirmation"
def pick_track(target_dir: Path, playbook: str, requested_track: str) -> tuple[str, str]:
if requested_track != "auto":
return requested_track, "explicitly requested"
return detect_track(target_dir, playbook)
def write_text(target: Path, content: str, force: bool) -> str:
if target.exists() and not force:
return f"skip {target}"
target.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
target.write_text(content.rstrip() + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
return f"write {target}"
def bullets(items: list[str], fallback: str) -> str:
rows = items or [fallback]
return "\n".join(f"- {item}" for item in rows)
def runtime_model_line(runtime: dict[str, Any]) -> tuple[str, str, str]:
current_providers = runtime.get("current_providers", {})
codex = current_providers.get("codex") or {}
claude = current_providers.get("claude") or {}
primary = (
f"GPT-5.4 Pro xhigh via Codex provider {codex.get('name', 'n/a')} "
f"({codex.get('endpoint_host', 'n/a')})"
)
secondary = (
f"Claude Opus 4.6 via Claude provider {claude.get('name', 'n/a')} "
f"({claude.get('endpoint_host', 'n/a')})"
)
fallback = "GLM / Kimi / Minimax only when primary models are blocked, then return through a compact handoff."
return primary, secondary, fallback
def render_claude(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
track = context["track_profile"]
return f"""# CLAUDE.md
## Project
- Name: {context['project_name']}
- Goal: {context['goal']}
- Audience: {context['audience']}
## Scope
### In Scope
{bullets(context['in_scope'], 'Confirm scope during Setup.')}
### Out of Scope
{bullets(context['out_of_scope'], 'Confirm out-of-scope boundaries during Setup.')}
## Design Philosophy
- KISS: Prefer the smallest design that can satisfy the current spec.
- DRY: Reuse validated patterns; do not fork architectural styles without approval.
- YAGNI: Do not build optional abstraction layers before the spec requires them.
- Type Safety First: Keep the application main path in TypeScript with strict checks.
- Preferred Architectural Shape: {track['label']} with one primary route, one auth path, one ORM path.
## Default Stack
- Track: {track['label']} ({context['track_reason']})
- Language: {track['language']}
- UI: {track['ui']}
- Styling: {track['styling']}
- Auth: {track['auth']}
- Data Fetching: {track['data_fetching']}
- Router: {track['router']}
- Service Layer: {track['service_layer']}
- ORM: {track['orm']}
- Database: {track['database']}
## Model Routing
- Primary planning and implementation: {context['primary_model']}
- Secondary review: {context['secondary_model']}
- Fallback: {context['fallback_model']}
## Hard Boundaries
- Do not introduce: Python/PHP on the product application main path, JavaScript-only defaults, or a second primary framework track.
- Do not modify: Approved specs, workflow gate definitions, or acceptance criteria without updating related docs and ADRs.
- Do not bypass: Spec review, gap analysis, handoff structure, or acceptance checks.
- Exceptions require: ADR in `.decisions/`, plus project owner and technical lead approval.
## Process Requirements
- Follow stages: Setup -> Research -> Spec -> Code -> Alignment -> Refinement -> Acceptance.
- Source of truth: `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `ANALYSIS.md`, `TODO.yaml`, `SPECS/`, `.workflow/selected-playbook.md`.
- Required review gates: Setup boundary confirmation, Spec review before Code, Acceptance review before release.
- Required testing posture: Run typecheck, lint, build, and targeted tests for changed behavior.
- Required refactor rhythm: Simplify after each implementation step and refactor after each batch.
## Skills And Templates
- Preferred skills: `cc-switch-dev-workflow`, stage-specific planning/review/implementation skills, and the approved gap/refactor skills when applicable.
- Required templates: `templates/claude-md-template.md`, `templates/agents-md-template.md`, `templates/analysis-template.md`, `templates/todo-yaml-template.md`, `templates/spec-template.md`, `templates/agent-handoff-template.md`.
## Definition Of Done
- Spec approved: The current spec is reviewable, testable, and accepted by the responsible human reviewer.
- Tests pass: Required checks pass or remaining failures are explicitly documented with owner approval.
- Alignment complete: No high-priority spec/code gaps remain hidden.
- Acceptance signed off: Final acceptance checklist is reviewed by a human owner.
"""
def render_agents(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
track = context["track_profile"]
return f"""# AGENTS.md
## Mission
- Project: {context['project_name']}
- Goal: {context['goal']}
- Audience: {context['audience']}
## Scope
### In Scope
{bullets(context['in_scope'], 'Confirm scope during Setup.')}
### Out of Scope
{bullets(context['out_of_scope'], 'Confirm out-of-scope boundaries during Setup.')}
## Read First
- `CLAUDE.md`
- `AGENTS.md`
- `ANALYSIS.md`
- `TODO.yaml`
- `.workflow/selected-playbook.md`
- `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}`
## Workflow Contract
- Follow stages: Setup -> Research -> Spec -> Code -> Alignment -> Refinement -> Acceptance.
- Current playbook: {context['playbook_label']}
- Reset points: after Research -> Spec, after Spec review -> Code, and after any fallback detour.
- Human approval gates: stack exceptions, spec approval, and final acceptance.
## Stack Guardrails
- Track: {track['label']} ({context['track_reason']})
- Language: {track['language']}
- UI: {track['ui']}
- Styling: {track['styling']}
- Auth: {track['auth']}
- Data Fetching: {track['data_fetching']}
- Router: {track['router']}
- Service Layer: {track['service_layer']}
- ORM: {track['orm']}
- Database: {track['database']}
## Model Routing
- Primary planning and implementation: {context['primary_model']}
- Secondary review: {context['secondary_model']}
- Fallback: {context['fallback_model']}
## Boundaries
- Do not introduce: a second primary framework route, Python/PHP application code, or speculative abstractions.
- Do not modify: accepted specs or workflow gate docs without updating references and ADRs.
- Do not bypass: required testing, simplification/refactor checkpoints, or the handoff contract.
- Ask before: changing stack track, introducing exceptions, deleting validated files, or contradicting accepted specs.
## Execution Defaults
- Preferred testing posture: typecheck + lint + build + changed-scope tests.
- Refactor rhythm: every implementation batch must be followed by simplify/refactor review.
- Handoff format: Goal / Scope / Non-Goals / Source of Truth / Constraints / Deliverable / Validation / Escalation.
- Done means: approved spec, documented plan, validated changes, and explicit acceptance state.
"""
def render_analysis(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
return f"""# ANALYSIS
## Goal
- {context['goal']}
## Scope
### Included
{bullets(context['in_scope'], 'Confirm scope during Setup.')}
### Excluded
{bullets(context['out_of_scope'], 'Confirm out-of-scope boundaries during Setup.')}
## Inputs
- Selected playbook: `.workflow/selected-playbook.md`
- Workflow overview: `.workflow/knowledge-base-overview.md`
- Stage index: `.workflow/stage-index.md`
- Runtime alignment source: `{context['runtime_source']}`
## Findings
- Current track decision: {context['track_profile']['label']} ({context['track_reason']}).
- Current primary model path: {context['primary_model']}.
- Current secondary review path: {context['secondary_model']}.
- First-round repo artifacts should stabilize Setup and unlock Research/Spec without revisiting raw notes.
## Priority
1. Confirm the single stack track and hard boundaries in `CLAUDE.md` and `AGENTS.md`.
2. Review and tighten `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}` so it becomes a real source of truth.
3. Expand `TODO.yaml` into executable plan/impl tasks before implementation starts.
## Structure
- Workflow Foundation: stage contract, handoff contract, human gates.
- Stack And Model Policy: approved track, model routing, exception interface.
- Execution Queue: Research, Spec expansion, implementation planning, simplification/refactor checkpoints.
## Risks
- The selected track may still need human confirmation if the repo baseline contradicts the default.
- Existing code or undocumented requirements may widen scope after initial Research.
- Fallback models must not become the default execution path.
## Decisions Needed
- Confirm project goal wording and success boundary.
- Confirm stack track if the repo baseline differs from the default detection.
- Confirm the first product-domain spec that should follow the bootstrap spec.
## Exit Criteria
- `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `ANALYSIS.md`, `TODO.yaml`, `.ralphy/config.yaml`, and `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}` are present and internally consistent.
"""
def build_tasks(context: dict[str, Any]) -> list[tuple[str, str]]:
date_stamp = context["date_stamp"]
spec_path = f"SPECS/{context['spec_file']}"
if context["playbook"] == "new-project-from-scaffold":
return [
(
f"Plan repository foundation in .plans/{date_stamp}-foundation-bootstrap.md using .workflow/selected-playbook.md, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and {spec_path}",
"Scope: repo root. Validation: track choice, bootstrap spec sections, and first implementation boundary are explicit.",
),
(
f"Implement repository scaffold in repo root, covering {spec_path}, and use tdd-implementing to follow .plans/{date_stamp}-foundation-bootstrap.md",
"Validation: create the approved stack skeleton, baseline commands, and initial checks without introducing a second track.",
),
(
f"Review repo root for simplification opportunities after foundation scaffold and use code-simplifying skill",
"Keep behavior unchanged and remove setup noise before the next feature spec.",
),
(
f"Review repo root for refactoring opportunities and use code-refactoring skill to generate .plans/{date_stamp}-foundation-refactor.md",
"Focus: DRY, KISS, and stable module boundaries for future specs.",
),
]
if context["playbook"] == "existing-project-spec-backfill-and-refactor":
return [
(
f"Plan baseline audit in .plans/{date_stamp}-baseline-audit.md using .workflow/selected-playbook.md, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and {spec_path}",
"Scope: current repo modules, boundaries, tests, and debt hotspots. Validation: produce a stable baseline for Spec backfill.",
),
(
f"Write or tighten {spec_path} and update ANALYSIS.md with current-repo findings before deeper refactor work",
"Validation: the spec reflects real boundaries, approved constraints, and the current alignment target.",
),
(
f"Generate alignment and refactor queue in TODO.yaml covering current repo modules and use spec-tasking plus code-refactoring references",
"Impact: create executable tasks that reference concrete paths, specs, and future plan files.",
),
(
f"Review current repo modules for simplification opportunities after baseline audit and use code-simplifying skill",
"Keep behavior unchanged and remove obvious complexity before larger refactor batches.",
),
]
return [
(
f"Plan spec-code gap analysis in .plans/{date_stamp}-gap-analysis.md using .workflow/selected-playbook.md, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, and {spec_path}",
"Scope: accepted specs, current code, failing or missing tests. Validation: classify Missing, Partial, Divergent, Untested, and Integration gaps.",
),
(
f"Generate alignment queue in TODO.yaml for current repo modules, referencing {spec_path} and .plans/{date_stamp}-gap-analysis.md",
"Validation: every task title names the target path and evidence source; insert simplify/refactor checkpoints by batch.",
),
(
f"Implement highest-priority gap closure in repo root, covering accepted specs, and use tdd-implementing to follow .plans/{date_stamp}-gap-analysis.md",
"Validation: close the highest-risk gaps first and record residual risks explicitly.",
),
(
f"Review gap-closure changes for simplification opportunities and use code-simplifying skill",
"Keep behavior aligned to spec and remove incidental complexity after each closure batch.",
),
]
def render_todo(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
tasks = build_tasks(context)
lines = ["tasks:"]
for title, description in tasks:
lines.append(f' - title: "{title}"')
lines.append(f' description: "{description}"')
lines.append(" completed: false")
lines.append("")
return "\n".join(lines).rstrip() + "\n"
def render_spec(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
track = context["track_profile"]
return f"""# Workflow Bootstrap And Project Constraints
## Overview
- Defines: the first-round workflow contract, stack track, model routing, and document set for {context['project_name']}.
- Not Covered: feature-level product details beyond the initial bootstrap boundary.
- Related SPECS: add feature/domain specs after this file is accepted.
## Terminology
- Workflow Bootstrap: the initial rule layer that makes later Research, Spec, and Code work deterministic.
- Approved Track: the single allowed stack path for the application main path.
- Handoff: the compact context package that moves work between agents or threads.
## Domain Sections
### Delivery Workflow
- Rule: All work follows `{context['playbook_label']}` under the 7-stage contract: Setup -> Research -> Spec -> Code -> Alignment -> Refinement -> Acceptance.
- Acceptance: `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `ANALYSIS.md`, `TODO.yaml`, `.ralphy/config.yaml`, and `.workflow/selected-playbook.md` exist and do not contradict each other.
> **Why**: The workflow must be stable before feature implementation starts.
> **Rejected**: Free-form prompting without a fixed stage contract.
### Stack Track
- Rule: The application main path uses `{track['label']}` with `{track['language']}`, `{track['ui']}`, `{track['styling']}`, `{track['auth']}`, `{track['data_fetching']}`, `{track['router']}`, `{track['service_layer']}`, `{track['orm']}`, and `{track['database']}`.
- Acceptance: No second primary router, auth path, ORM, or styling system is introduced without ADR approval.
> **Why**: Agent output quality drops when multiple primary tracks coexist.
> **Rejected**: Dual-track implementations or untyped main-path languages.
### Model Routing And Review
- Rule: Planning and implementation default to `{context['primary_model']}`; long-document digestion and second-view review default to `{context['secondary_model']}`.
- Acceptance: Any fallback usage is summarized back into the standard handoff contract before the main thread continues.
> **Why**: Multi-model workflows only stay reliable when routing is explicit.
> **Rejected**: Letting fallback models become the default path.
### First-Round Deliverables
- Rule: The first-round working set must include a bootstrap spec, project execution files, a task queue, and an explicit handoff for the next stage.
- Acceptance: `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}`, `.handoff/setup-handoff.md`, and `.workflow/first-round-prompts.md` are present and point to the same source of truth.
> **Why**: The next agent should not need the raw setup conversation to continue.
> **Rejected**: Starting implementation from memory or scattered notes.
## Forbidden
- Do not: introduce Python or PHP on the application main path, add a second primary stack track, or bypass spec review.
- Use instead: TypeScript + React on the approved track, standard handoff, and explicit ADRs for exceptions.
- Reason: reliability, testability, and agent consistency depend on fixed constraints.
## References
- Internal:
- `CLAUDE.md`
- `AGENTS.md`
- `ANALYSIS.md`
- `TODO.yaml`
- `.workflow/selected-playbook.md`
- `.workflow/knowledge-base-overview.md`
- External:
- `references/knowledge-base/platform/framework-decision-matrix.md`
- `references/knowledge-base/platform/model-routing-policy.md`
- `references/knowledge-base/platform/stack-policy.md`
"""
def render_ralphy(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
return f"""project:
name: {context['project_slug']}
workflow: cc-switch-dev-workflow
playbook: {context['playbook']}
track: {context['track_profile']['label']}
commands:
test: pnpm test
lint: pnpm lint
build: pnpm build
typecheck: pnpm exec tsc --noEmit
rules:
- Read CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, ANALYSIS.md, TODO.yaml, and .workflow/selected-playbook.md before implementation.
- Keep one approved stack track and one approved model-routing policy.
- Every task title must be self-contained with path and reference.
- Run simplify and refactor checkpoints after each implementation batch.
references:
- CLAUDE.md
- AGENTS.md
- ANALYSIS.md
- TODO.yaml
- SPECS/{context['spec_file']}
- .workflow/selected-playbook.md
"""
def render_prompts(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
return f"""# First-Round Prompts
## Prompt 1: Setup Confirmation
基于当前仓库和以下初始化产物,确认项目边界和单一技术轨道:`CLAUDE.md`、`AGENTS.md`、`ANALYSIS.md`、`TODO.yaml`、`SPECS/{context['spec_file']}`、`.workflow/selected-playbook.md`。如果发现现有代码与默认轨道冲突,只输出差异、风险和建议,不直接改代码。
## Prompt 2: Research And Spec Expansion
基于 `ANALYSIS.md`、`.workflow/selected-playbook.md` 和 `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}`,扩展第一轮 `.research/*.md` 和后续产品/模块 Spec。只保留与目标 `{context['goal']}` 相关的结论、模块边界和拒绝理由。
## Prompt 3: Tasking And Implementation Plan
基于 `TODO.yaml`、`CLAUDE.md`、`AGENTS.md` 和 `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}`,生成下一轮 `.plans/*.md`,把每个真实任务拆成可执行的 Plan/Impl 对,并在批次后插入 simplify/refactor 检查点。
"""
def render_handoff(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
return f"""# Handoff
## Goal
- Start the first real workflow round for {context['project_name']} under the {context['playbook_label']} playbook.
## Scope
- Confirm boundaries in `CLAUDE.md` and `AGENTS.md`.
- Tighten `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}`.
- Expand `TODO.yaml` into the next actionable plan files.
## Non-Goals
- Do not implement broad product features yet.
- Do not change the approved stack track without review.
- Do not bypass spec or acceptance gates.
## Source of Truth
- `CLAUDE.md`
- `AGENTS.md`
- `ANALYSIS.md`
- `TODO.yaml`
- `SPECS/{context['spec_file']}`
- `.workflow/selected-playbook.md`
## Constraints
- Keep one primary stack track.
- Keep the main path in TypeScript + React.
- Use explicit handoff and reset rules when switching agents or models.
## Deliverable
- Updated analysis, tightened spec, next `.plans/*.md`, and an implementation-ready task queue.
## Validation
- The next agent can proceed without raw setup chat.
- The stack track, model routing, and task queue remain internally consistent.
- Human decisions required by the setup round are clearly listed.
## Escalation
- Stop and ask when: the repo baseline contradicts the chosen track, the spec needs a structural exception, or the first implementation batch would violate accepted boundaries.
"""
def render_meetings_readme(context: dict[str, Any]) -> str:
lines = [
"# Meetings",
"",
"Place raw notes, screenshots, or imported meeting summaries for this repo here.",
"",
"Current bootstrap context:",
f"- Project: {context['project_name']}",
f"- Playbook: {context['playbook_label']}",
f"- Goal: {context['goal']}",
]
if context["source_notes"]:
lines.extend(["", "Suggested source notes:"])
lines.extend(f"- {note}" for note in context["source_notes"])
return "\n".join(lines) + "\n"
def build_context(args: argparse.Namespace, target_dir: Path) -> dict[str, Any]:
project_name = args.project_name or target_dir.name
project_slug = slugify(project_name)
playbook_profile = PLAYBOOK_CONTEXT[args.playbook]
track_key, track_reason = pick_track(target_dir, args.playbook, args.track)
runtime = collect_summary(Path.home() / ".cc-switch") if collect_summary else {}
primary_model, secondary_model, fallback_model = runtime_model_line(runtime) if runtime else (
"GPT-5.4 Pro xhigh",
"Claude Opus 4.6",
"GLM / Kimi / Minimax only when blocked",
)
return {
"project_name": project_name,
"project_slug": project_slug,
"goal": args.goal or playbook_profile["goal_hint"],
"audience": args.audience or "Internal team and future implementing agents",
"playbook": args.playbook,
"playbook_label": playbook_profile["label"],
"spec_file": args.spec_file or playbook_profile["spec_file"],
"in_scope": parse_list(args.in_scope) or playbook_profile["default_in_scope"],
"out_of_scope": parse_list(args.out_of_scope) or playbook_profile["default_out_of_scope"],
"track_profile": TRACKS[track_key],
"track_reason": track_reason,
"primary_model": primary_model,
"secondary_model": secondary_model,
"fallback_model": fallback_model,
"runtime_source": str(Path.home() / ".cc-switch") if runtime else "knowledge-base default policy",
"date_stamp": datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d"),
"source_notes": parse_list(args.source_note),
}
def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Generate first-round workflow artifacts for a target repo.")
parser.add_argument("--target-dir", required=True, help="Absolute or relative repo directory to initialize.")
parser.add_argument("--playbook", required=True, choices=sorted(PLAYBOOK_FILES))
parser.add_argument("--project-name", help="Human-readable project name. Defaults to target directory name.")
parser.add_argument("--goal", help="Primary project goal for the bootstrap set.")
parser.add_argument("--audience", help="Primary audience for the product or repo.")
parser.add_argument("--in-scope", action="append", help="Comma-separated in-scope items. Can be passed multiple times.")
parser.add_argument("--out-of-scope", action="append", help="Comma-separated out-of-scope items. Can be passed multiple times.")
parser.add_argument("--source-note", action="append", help="Comma-separated raw note or source doc names to remember.")
parser.add_argument(
"--track",
choices=("auto", "hono-react-ssr-tanstack", "nextjs-fullstack"),
default="auto",
help="Preferred application track. Defaults to auto detection + workflow tie-break.",
)
parser.add_argument("--spec-file", help="Custom bootstrap spec filename under SPECS/.")
parser.add_argument("--force", action="store_true", help="Overwrite existing generated files.")
return parser.parse_args()
def main() -> int:
args = parse_args()
target_dir = Path(args.target_dir).expanduser().resolve()
target_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
writes = seed_workspace(
target_dir,
args.playbook,
args.force,
include_core_docs=False,
include_ralphy_config=False,
)
context = build_context(args, target_dir)
generated_files = {
target_dir / "CLAUDE.md": render_claude(context),
target_dir / "AGENTS.md": render_agents(context),
target_dir / "ANALYSIS.md": render_analysis(context),
target_dir / "TODO.yaml": render_todo(context),
target_dir / "SPECS" / context["spec_file"]: render_spec(context),
target_dir / ".ralphy" / "config.yaml": render_ralphy(context),
target_dir / ".workflow" / "first-round-prompts.md": render_prompts(context),
target_dir / ".handoff" / "setup-handoff.md": render_handoff(context),
target_dir / ".meetings" / "README.md": render_meetings_readme(context),
}
for target, content in generated_files.items():
writes.append(write_text(target, content, True))
manifest_path = target_dir / ".workflow" / "bootstrap-manifest.json"
manifest = {
"skill": "cc-switch-dev-workflow",
"mode": "full-init",
"generated_at": datetime.now(timezone.utc).isoformat(),
"project_name": context["project_name"],
"playbook": args.playbook,
"track": context["track_profile"]["label"],
"track_reason": context["track_reason"],
"spec_file": context["spec_file"],
}
writes.append(write_text(manifest_path, json.dumps(manifest, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False), True))
print("\n".join(writes))
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(main())